User talk:Pere prlpz/Archive 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ajudar usuària Ganxona

Bones Pere, podries fer una revisió de les càrregues de la usuària Ganxona. Està començant a col·laborar amb l'Arxiu Municipal de Sant Feliu de Guíxols però tenen dubtes de temes drets. Jo he parlat amb ells sovint per correu, però necessiten ajuda d'un usuari avançat. pots fer un petit escombrat? Té poques càrregues? Gràcies!--Kippelboy (talk) 08:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

@Kippelboy: Ja li vaig explicar a ca:Usuari_Discussió:Ganxona#Imatges_problem.C3.A0tiques quan vaig veure les imatges. Resumint, crec que no se'n pot conservar ni una.
Algunes imatges clarament no són de domini públic perquè són massa recents. D'altres segurament tampoc ho són, però si ho fossin no es podria justificar perquè no en saben ni la data de publicació ni l'autor. A més, no poden demanar autorització per cap imatge perquè no en saben els autors.
Potser si un advocat analitzés les condicions en que es van cedir els documents a l'arxiu hi podria fer alguna cosa, però ho dubto, perquè sembla que, senzillament, els personatges o els seus parents van fer donació de les fotos que tenien i que vés a saber qui les havia fet, de manera que segurament ni qui va cedir-les a l'Arxiu tindria drets suficients per publicar-les amb una llicència lliure.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:A Lluís Companys P1450740.JPG, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 21:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:A Lluís Companys P1450741.JPG, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 21:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

File:A Lluís Companys P1450740.JPG

File:A Lluís Companys P1450740.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JuTa 17:56, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

File:A Lluís Companys P1450741.JPG

File:A Lluís Companys P1450741.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JuTa 17:57, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Lo siento

La opinión de un tercero vino en forma de borrado fulminante :-( --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 14:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Raafat

Thanks for your message , sorry did not understand it you ask me for my identity and to be mailed , what kind of identity and to be sent to who? (Raafat (talk) 11:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC))

@Raafat: You can ask Jim in the deletion request what kind of statement he is asking for. Sending to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org some documents proving that you are the heir would be definitive, but I suppose a lot less would be enough, too.--Pere prlpz (talk) 21:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Help

Dear Pere prlpz
Please tag to delete the blurred versions
I am not sure how to do it.
Best wishes
Aftab Banoori (Talk) 15:16, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

@Aftabbanoori: I think there isn't an established process to tag versions, but you can say you agree with me in the deletion request page - if you do - and I expect the closing admin to revert.--Pere prlpz (talk) 15:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Dear Pere Prplz
Thanks for your prompt reply
I am grateful for your help
I am also grateful for you your comments about the picture Silver ghost.jpg
I hope now Admin will keep the picture
Regards
Aftab Banoori (Talk) 17:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

ICGC

Hi, I restored that map. Do we need some kind of license review for these? GIF is an outdated format, other files should be reuploeded as PNG. This is very interesting, but I don't see any way to download a map from there. Any idea, other than making screenshots? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:16, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

You can download full sheets of maps and aerial orthophotos in a set of formats going to http://www.icc.cat/vissir3/ and clicking "catàleg i descàrrega" in the left side. Jpeg images are directly available just for screen view, but other formats can be easily converted - I usually download MrSid maps and photograps and convert them to jpeg using Irfanview. However, I don't expect mass importing of such maps to Commons to be very useful, just as we don't routinely import OpenStreetMap tiles just because the license allows us to do it. I think the maps and aerial photos would be mostly used to make our own derivative small maps or graphics to illustrate articles. For example, aerial views of big castles, ports or dams can be useful.
The deleted images were made by somebody to illustrate particular articles. I can't see the deleted images and I can't remember if they were interesting, but if restored they might be used to easily illustrate the same articles again - although I can't be sure about that without seeing the images. Furthermore WIWOSM maps might have rendered some gif locator maps obsolete.
About license reviewing I'm not sure what is needed. I think a dedicated template would be useful. A problem might arise with some uploaders misunderstanding of license for images in ICGC website that are their own. For example, in http://www.icc.cat/vissir3/index.html?DJ3uj2TEJ you can see at bottom right "Ministerio de Defensa" credited for this 1946 aerial images, and therefore the photo is not covered by the free license. I suppose a dedicated license review is not needed and the usual deletion procedures will be enough.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: I forgot to notify.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:31, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
A login and password is required. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: Yes, it is, but registering is free. You just need to click on "Vull registrar-me". In case you need, the website is also available in English and Spanish (upper right).--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:09, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
So I registered, but then I got a ZIP file which contains 3 files. It seems that the map is a SID file, which requires a some plugin or converter to open. I trying to install that plugin, but it doesn't work on my setup (Vista+Chrome). It probably doesn't work on Linux. So not so easy. Looking at Category:Topographic maps of Spain, I see that there is not that much choice. Personally, I would support upload of some maps on Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Current ICGC instructions to convert MrSid to Jpeg or Tiff are in http://www.icc.cat/cat/Home-ICC/Mapes-escolars-i-divulgacio/Preguntes-i-respostes/Com-transformar-un-MrSid-en-TIFF-o-JPEG (as usual, English and Spanish versions available).
I still follow the instructions as it were some years ago, the first time I downloaded an ICC map, and I use Irfanview with a MrSid plugin. It's a free program with a lot of plugins and it works fine for me with Windows XP. http://www.irfanview.com/
I also tried GeoWiewer (a free Lizardthech viewer) as present instructions advice, but I think it's a lot more complicated if you just want to convert a MrSid map to jpeg. However, it is sometimes useful if you want to stitch together several sheets.--Pere prlpz (talk) 11:42, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: --Pere prlpz (talk) 11:43, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Gràcies per participar en Wiki Loves Earth 2015!

Benvolgut Pere prlpz:

En nom d'Amical Wikimedia i la resta d'institucions que organitzen Wiki Loves Earth, volem donar-te les gràcies per la teva participació en aquest concurs i et volem convidar a l'acte de lliurament de premis que tindrà lloc el proper dia 15 de juliol a les 19 hores al Museu de Ciències de Barcelona (Plaça del Fòrum, 1). Pots trobar tota la informació sobre l'acte al web del concurs wikilovesearth.cat

Cordialment, Amical Wikimedia --KRLS Bot (talk) 14:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Consulta

Hola Pere! Vaig trobar ahir aquesta imatge que jo diria que és una violació dels drets d'autor però, en temes d'aquests d'imatges, commons, plantilles d'avisos, etc, estic totalment perduda. No hi ha cap pressa, si pots i tens temps, ho mires? sense compromís, obvi :) Mercès!--Yeza (talk) 08:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

@Yeza: Aquesta imatge (i algunes més de les carregades per en User:Bibbea són copiades de webs que, d'acord amb els seus avisos legals, no tenen llicències lliures ni permeten copiar-ne els continguts. Per aquests casos evidents la plantilla és {{Copyvio}}. Pels casos no evidents es fa una proposta d'esborrat.
Com que tot això són imatges de Mollerussa, notifico l'user:ESM per si de cas pogués/volgués fer alguna cosa amb aquest tema.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Sí, és massa evident que no hauria d'estar aquí, per desgracia. Bé, no em queda altre que marcar-la i, aprofito el fil amb el teu permís Pere per no desperdigolar-me, per demanar a l'ESM si ella en té o pot aconseguir alguna fotografia o imatge per posar a l'article de la Fira de Sant Josep. Moltes gràcies Pere! :) --Yeza (talk) 15:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
@Yeza and Pere prlpz: Ja em va estranyar que la imatge sobrevisqués tant temps a la Viquipèdia. A l'edició d'aquest any ja intentaré fer algunes fotografies per alegrar una mica l'article, que encara té molt camí per recórrer. Gràcies per vetllar-ho! --ESM (talk) 15:39, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Categories a Catalunya

Com pots veure a Category: Culture of Catalonia, hi ha una subcategoria Category: Transport in Catalonia by comarque i no he creat una Category: Transport in Catalonia by province, perquè tinc els meus dubtes sobre si val la pena crear-la només per a quatre províncies, però l'estructura de la categoria dóna totes les facilitats del món per crear-la si es creu necessari, només cal fer-ho i passar quatre categories a la subcategoria creada.

Com ja li he comentat a Isidre blanc, les categories que he organitzat o creat, segueixen el model de les jerarquies superiors. No entenc perquè Catalunya, Aragó, Balears i País Valencià han de ser una excepció en la jerarquia de categories, així que agrairia una explicació més raonada dels motius que el simple fet que ningú hagi modificat res des de fa un temps, perquè això es dóna en un milió d'àmbits de la jerarquia.

Això de que hi ha alguna comarca, com "Osona", que tenen algun municipi en una altra província, ja m'ho havia plantejat però era bastant anecdòtic, pel que vaig optar per no prendre cap decisió i esperar a veure si es plantejava aquest tema per algú més i veure a quina conclusió es podia arribar.

Com ja li he dit a Tyk, ( Category: Buildings in the Community of Madrid), hi ha unes poques comunitats com Madrid que són alhora província i, almenys per a mi, la lògica sembla que apunta que si hi ha una plantilla de navegació per les províncies, que la inclouen totes, i una altra per a les comunitats, que també, en aquests pocs casos haurien d'incloure les dues.

Sobre això de plantilles col·lapsades o desplegades, he vist en Wikipedia algunes plantilles que es despleguen, però no he entrat en aquest tema i no entenc molt bé a què et refereixes.--JT Curses (talk) 18:01, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Sobre comarques que no coincideixen geogràficament amb una sola província, jo només sé el cas d'Osona i Berguedà. Si sabeu d'algun cas més, us ho agrairia. Aniré rectificant aquests casos.--JT Curses (talk) 20:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)


Hello, Pere prlpz. You have new messages at DarwIn's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Pinus pinea

Ola Pere prlpz, I see you are a fellow from Galiza, I'm Portuguese, so there's no need to stay in confusion and misunderstandings. I believe I understand your point, I already suspected that Pinus pinea is native to the Mediterranean region, and the classification of Pinus pinea in Spain, Portugal, Italy and France as an ornamental tree was not exact. The thing is that I'm classifying architecture now, not plants, those Pinus pinea where nothing but a side effect, since the castle I'm doing now is filled with them, and they were all planted in the 1940s, therefore cultivated. Anyway, I've not moved anything outside what already was marked as "cultivated", and even moved the seedlings to the upper category, as they can be both cultivated and wild. I've no idea if we still have wild Pinus pinea in Portugal, Spain, Italy, France or whatever, so I used the system which was already there. If you know that some images refer to wild specimens instead of cultivated ones, just create a second category inside that one named "Pinus pinea (cultivated) in Spain" and move there all the files I've placed inside "Pinus pinea in Spain". I can't do that because I don't know the areas where they grow wild. In Portugal most of them are cultivated or naturalized. Ata despois, -- Darwin Ahoy! 02:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

@DarwIn: Eu non soi de Galiza, mas eu entendo o portuguès. O Pinus pinea é nativo do todo o Mediterrâneo e da metade oeste da Peninsula Ibérica. Una categoria "cultivated" para cada estado seria una boa cousa, mas eu non soi en este trabalho por agora. Ata depois.--Pere prlpz (talk) 22:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Hey Pere, perdoa-me a confusão, é que vi "soy gallego" no alto da página e pensei que eras da Galiza, mas a Catalunha é igualmente irmã, ainda mais com a languedoc que nos une a todos. Eu percebo razoavelmente o catalão, e até já tenho participado na wiki-ca, mas infelizmente não sou capaz de escrever correctamente nessa língua, ao menos por agora. Bom, mas já nos entendemos nos Pinus pinea, que hão de ser os "Pi's" por aí, pelo que percebi das imagens. Algum dia que tenha pachorra la tentarei arrumar aquilo. Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 00:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)


català | Deutsch | English | español | galego | +/−

Wiki Loves Monuments Spain 2016 is coming!

Dear Pere prlpz,

As every year, Wiki Loves Monuments in Spain, an international photographic contest about cultural heritage in the Spanish territory, will start on next September 1st. On behalf of the Wikipedia community and Wikimedia España (WM-ES), and as a participant in former editions of the event, or in other photographic contests organized by WM-ES, we'd like to encourage you to participate in the 2016 edition. We do know that you've been keen on contributing your work to the free knowledge in the past and therefore believe that you'll be glad to help us again.

We want to inform you about a substantial change in the rules of the contest: this year only images of monuments or municipalities without previous photograph in Wikimedia Commons are accepted. To facilitate hunting monuments and municipalities without a free image, we have prepared a set of specific lists, which can be checked in the contest websites: wikilov.es/monuments or wikilm.es

If you have comments, questions or suggestions about the contest, they are more than welcome. You can leave them here.

We look forward to your free images!

Sincerely,

The team of Wiki Loves Monuments edition in Spain
 Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pere_prlpz/Archive_9&oldid=659205585"