User:ComputerHotline/Archive 16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-05 14-31-52-fort-roppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-03 15-53-04-goutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 19:40, 10 February 2013

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-10 15-20-33-poste-opt-salbert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 19:04, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-05 13-54-49-fort-roppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK I think. --Mattbuck 23:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-03 16-00-41-goutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Marginal, but probably ok. --Mattbuck 22:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-03 15-42-53-goutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-03 15-40-12-goutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-03 15-35-26-goutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-03 15-38-40-goutte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-01-31 15-02-52-noisetier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2013-02-05 13-54-49-fort-roppe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013-02-05 13-54-49-fort-roppe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-22 19-24-09-reunion-soc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 06:55, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 17-40-15-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 17-51-41-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 21:33, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 17-25-43-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 16-57-43-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:50, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 17-15-24-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK. --A.Savin 11:44, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-03 14-25-53-f-salbert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-03 21-15-34-gde-casserole-5c-10f-10d-16o-ann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. I love this photography.--Grondin 12:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 17-28-02-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 17-48-03-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Mattbuck 21:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 17-53-55-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Mattbuck 21:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 17-20-24-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 00:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 17-16-37-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 00:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-02-28 17-21-35-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 00:27, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-12 15-06-50-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dschwen 20:40, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-12 15-09-02-details-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:38, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-03 14-47-19-f-salbert-stalagm-glace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-03-03 09-46-46-trilobite-7f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}