Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 31 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Semur-en-Auxois.-_Collégiale_Notre-Dame_Statue_du_Christ_souffrant.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Christ aux liens in Collégiale Notre-Dame de Semur-en-Auxois.--Pierre André Leclercq 16:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The detail level is too low sorry. Pierre takes great shots but the quality of this camera is not up to him --Poco a poco 19:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment The camera and the sensor are not that bad. The lens can also deliver decent pictures if you keep a few things in mind. It is very sharp in the center, but decreases significantly towards the edges. You want to use this with f/5.6 to f/11 if possible. Then the vignetting at the edge of the image is not as bad, but of course it can be corrected later, just like the quite strong barrel distortion. But what is really terrible is the JPG engine in the old NEX models, namely the destructive noise reduction and the tendency to over-sharpen. If you shoot RAW with these things and put some effort into post-processing, you can take very good pictures with them. Just not out-of-the-box. --Smial 12:42, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I have to agree with Poco, sorry. BigDom 09:58, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 23:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:56, 30 January 2023 (UTC)