Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Pittsburgh panoramas

Pittsburgh panoramas, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2015 at 03:28:18 (UTC)

• 
  Pittsburgh in daytime
• 
  Pittsburgh in nighttime

•  Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by dllu -- dllu (t,c) 03:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- dllu (t,c) 03:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Info The nighttime panorama is an FP on English Wikipedia. dllu (t,c) 03:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support - For whatever reason, the full-sized photos aren't loading on my computer, but I'm willing to support featuring both of these panoramas based on their great composition, beauty, view at the size shown here and fact that they're both Quality images already. But shouldn't there be two separate nominations, one for each picture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

• I think the two pictures are sufficiently related to each other by theme, so it makes sense to nominate them as a set. From the guidelines for set nominations, it's acceptable to nominate a set """If a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way""", for example, """A sequence of images showing the passage of time.""" And yes, it is a known issue that the 200 megapixel image takes a long time to load and may crash some browsers. dllu (t,c) 07:01, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

• Yes, I get your point about these two as a series. But how does that work in terms of their being shown on the front page? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

• I haven't thought this far yet. dllu (t,c) 07:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

• Ikan try the Zoom viewer links on the file description page. It makes such image more of an interactive experience. What to put on the front page isn't really our concern. -- Colin (talk) 10:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

• That's really cool. Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:24, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support though the nighttime picture should be denoised a little bit. I'd also support individual noms --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:28, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support, even though both panoramas aren't cut in exactly the same way and slightly differ in perspective. --Tremonist (talk) 13:47, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 14:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 15:45, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 20:05, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 10:22, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 10:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 10:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:54, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 10:36, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 13:22, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 10:54, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes