Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2017

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2017 at 20:13:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chimborazo seen from Riobamba - Ecuador, its summit is the farthest point on the Earth's surface from the Earth's center.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 23:01, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2017 at 20:37:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the parish- and pilgrimage church of the Assumption of Mary at Maria Saal, Carinthia, Austria – viewing in the direction of the high altar
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 23:02, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2017 at 20:40:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior of the parish church Pernegg, Lower Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 23:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2017 at 22:41:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Adams-Wabash, Chicago

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 18:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

===File:Porto Covo August 2017-4.jpg, not featured===

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2017 at 19:57:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aerial view of Porto Covo
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2017 at 22:50:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 07:50, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2017 at 09:02:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tower “Post”, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  •  Comment Do you think the area with the sun (behind the building)? IMO these are limits of the camera, but I tried to improve this area. IMO it's better now. Thanks for your review. --XRay talk 08:35, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 14:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2017 at 15:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old and new Pakri lighthouse
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 16:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 11:53:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thunder cloud over Gåseberg
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 16:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Clouds

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 17:28:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
@XRay: I don't understand, what do you mean? Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my misunderstandig. I thought 'location' should be placed under 'information', but above is possible too. --XRay talk 18:35, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 16:10:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Door handle with maize husk at the church portal of the subsidiary church in Sankt Peter am Bichl, Klagenfurt, Carinthia, Austria
 Comment During the days of Thanksgiving they adorn parts of the churches with crop plants, especially in rural areas. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Doors

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 21:15:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black-headed lapwing (Vanellus tectus tectus)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 11:15, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2017 at 06:40:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fabrication artisanale de briques à Antananarivo (Madagascar).
 Oppose This new version I feel has too many technical flaws to be overlooked by the "wow" factor. I thought the image was already uploaded as shot.--Peulle (talk) 07:42, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 11:14, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2017 at 15:21:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Corymbia fulva (Synonyms: Leptura fulva, Brachyleptura fulva, Stictoleptura fulva und Paracorymbia fulva)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 15:34, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2017 at 13:27:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wrangel Tower is a part of old Königsberg fortifications. Kaliningrad, Russia.
No idea. Should I remove it? --A.Savin 10:47, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like some weird CA, please get rid of it since it's visible even at thumb. --cart-Talk 12:36, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done. --A.Savin 12:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 15:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Russia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2017 at 23:15:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old man with a beard, Batumi, Georgia
  • IMO there is way too much contrast and clarity. The photo has almost only black and white with very few grey tones in between. I know it's a style, but in this case it comes off a bit too harsh. --cart-Talk 11:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @W.carter: I don't think this is really true. There is a large black area, so the linear histogram is not very developed. But if you look at the logarithmic histogram, you can see a lot of grey. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment None of us is capable of creating an artistic photo like Yann did. Chapeau! I bow down. For me this image is a splendid example how photography should be executed, artistically and technically superb. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose Per others, and the white frame is a no go for me.@Johann Jaritz: Yann, excellent photographer indeed, did not take this one...--Jebulon (talk) 15:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 17:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2017 at 09:43:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lake Mavrovo, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:20, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2017 at 07:31:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Debar Lake, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 17:54:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Thudufushi Island, Maldives
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2017 at 04:44:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

(Edit conflict)* Support Strong composition with a great deal of forward motion. Nothing wrong with the crop on the left side, it starts where the "motion" starts. --cart-Talk 07:59, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 08:29, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2017 at 12:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Femae Keeled skimmer
My bad, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 08:30, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2017 at 06:32:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

US constitution page 1
 Comment Maybe. I didn't think of that.--Peulle (talk) 19:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik (edits) 15:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1700-1800

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2017 at 10:08:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ankogel
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik (edits) 15:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2017 at 18:15:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jesse Richman kitesurfing
  •  Comment According to 'this article' the photo was taken "...off Maui known as Jaws in February 2016." Since the photo has been published online in several articles, I guess we can come up with more info by doing some picture searching with Google. Btw, "Jaws" is the same as Peahi, Hawaii. --cart-Talk 23:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2017 at 23:31:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hylotelephium spectabile (Showy Stonecrop)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2017 at 17:07:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stormy weather in Agios Minas bay
  • You really think it's my comment that's the inappropriate thing? Very well, I'll keep my views on these kinds of strange votes and comments to myself from now on, but everyone knows what's going on. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:04, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2017 at 05:30:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Canal of Sète at dusk. Hérault, France.
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 16:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2017 at 11:24:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 16:59, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2017 at 07:36:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Monumental stairway of the Palais Garnier, Opera of Paris, France
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2017 at 14:47:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2017 at 18:03:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • I did look at the original. The border looks a bit strange in the original, but it's clearly consistently parallel to the rest of the table, and therefore understandable as part of it. In the current version, it looks a bit ghostly and patchy, so it seems like some kind of defect in the photograph, instead of something that was actually there. I wouldn't be able to give any technical suggestions, but perhaps it might work best to rework that part of the photo from the RAW? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:13, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek: ✓ Done. Better now ?--Jebulon (talk) 16:14, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:20, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2017 at 04:39:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SVG exposure triangle
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
  •  Info All by me -- WClarke 04:39, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I've seen versions of this diagram, and have found the concept to be helpful, so I decided to make my own public-domain version for Wikipedia. Hopefully it is something photographers here can appreciate. At the very least, if it's not worth featuring, I can get comments from people who know this subject well. Thanks. -- WClarke 04:39, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Visually it is rather plain, and I don't think it is a work of illustrative art on the level of the best FP diagrams. Secondly I have never understood why some books refer to an exposure triangle. I suppose they think "three" and assume a triangle is a suitable visual metaphor. The corners of the triangle have nothing in common (e.g. freezes motion & shallow DoF), nor to they represent limits to any scale (one can go slower than 1s and faster than 1/1000s). Changing one dimension just makes a different shaped triangle, but doesn't tell you how the three attributes interact to form an image -- the area of the triangle for example, isn't relevant. A better visual metaphor is a cube, where the brightness of the resulting image relates to the volume, and the width = shutter duration, height = aperture size, and depth = ISO. An increase in any of these results in greater brightness. If one uses an appropriate scale, doubling the width (shutter duration) can be compensated by halving the height (aperture size) or depth (ISO) and the same volume (brightness) results. However, at the level of physics, only aperture and shutter speed matter to determine how many photons hit the sensor (if we exclude filters, adding flash light and sensor size as variables the photographer can control), since ISO in the digital age is simply post-capture amplification. -- Colin (talk) 07:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • The ISO thing makes more sense if you think of it as film sensitivity, so I wouldn't complain about that. But what's bothering me about this and all the other attempts I've see so far is that it doesn't actually tell you anything about exposure. What it should probably tell you is that, for example, at ISO 100, f/8 @ 1/250 will give you the same exposure as f/11 @ 1/125. Increase ISO to 200 and you'll get the same exposure as before at f/8 @ 1/125 or f/11 @ 1/250, or … . This attempt does this "for any given ISO", but you don't need a triangle for that. If demonstrating exposure is not the intention of this, it shouldn't be called an "exposure triangle". But then I think something like the first chart on this page would be much better suited to visualize the non-exposure related effects of changing aperture, shutter speed and film/sensor sensitivity. --El Grafo (talk) 09:46, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Agree that the diagram on the other page is better to show the effects of changing settings on the image qualities (other than exposure). The cube model does "explain" exposure and how the values each affect the total, but it isn't a particularly complex concept that one needs an analogy -- how much light is gathered by the sensor. The shutter duration and ISO values both double when the exposure doubles (goes up one stop). Only the aperture is strange with all those f/5.6 and f/8 numbers that don't seem to follow a sensible scale nor go the right direction! It makes more sense once you convert to the circular area of the aperture (e.g. f/8 is 122mm² on a 50mm lens, and f/5.6 is 250mm² which is double the area). I don't think the "triangle" model is adding anything useful. -- Colin (talk) 13:48, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Useful, probably a VI, not an FP in my eyes.--Peulle (talk) 12:29, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I like the idea actually, but would be much more intuitive if the triangle were coloured after the amount of exposure (black=dark, white=bright), each coordinate being more or less white. - Benh (talk) 18:55, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Peulle. Just too busy too effectively convey information ... I've seen this done better elsewhere. Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 18:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Access to the Metro Bilbao and Euskotren station of Uribarri. Bilbao, Biscay, Basque Country, Spain

Alt

[edit]

Bilbao - Acceso estación Uribarri v2

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 13:47, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 12:16:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 13:46, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2017 at 05:21:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Apis mellifera - Senecio paludosus
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 13:49, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 08:50:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view from the Heldrastein in Thuringia, near Hesse, Germany
 Info About 160°. I've added it into the image description now. More horizontal perspektive isn´t possible from the cliff. --Milseburg (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. I appreciate the labeling and the overall usefulness and of course achievement of this photo, but I don't like the hazy light much, so I'm likely to abstain from voting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:33, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 13:44, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 20:46:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Newark Penn Station at night
@Jebulon: That was a comment, not an argument. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 17:51:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Québec city at night, view from Lévis city
As you can see in the image description, the main object (quebec city) is far and I find very difficult to take a better picture with my current lens. Thanks --The Photographer 22:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, but could you dial back the highlights slightly? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:26, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I can't do it because the light difference. It's not a hdr picture and dial back the white will convert it on greay showing a false reality. In this case maybe the solution is buy another lens. I'm open to some recomendation.
I wouldn't be able to recommend anything; I just work with what I see. But making white and yellow highlights a little less bright is really going to make them gray? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:11, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek Yes, becasue it was allready done, I uploaded the raw, maybe you would help. --The Photographer 16:18, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 16:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Safety boats, ferry, Aidipsos, Evia Greece
  • I don't think so. Any more exposure and many of the small highlights will be blown. Histogram looks ok too. The boats are just a bit dirty. --cart-Talk 08:32, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you cart. I'm not sure that Ermell is totaly wrong nevertheless... I have the same feeling, but the light was so harsh that the use of a filter was a mandatory. Anyway, I'm not toooootaly happy with this orange. But there is no way to improve this (I tried...). As you say: Any more exposure and many of the small highlights will be blown.--Jebulon (talk) 15:11, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 20:11:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Central dome of the Trinity Cathedral in Saint Petersburg.
--A.Savin 23:30, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - The photo seems to clearly slope down to the left of center, and at least the smaller dome on the right seems to slope down to the right. I see no-one's commented on this, but why is it happening, and should anything be done to fix it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:58, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ikan Kekek: my guess would be lens distortion, which is pretty common in drone cameras (but not always as recognizable as here, depending on what's depicted). The focal length of 8.8 mm has about the same field of view as a 24 mm lens on 135 format ("Full Frame"). That's a pretty wide angle, so some distortion can be expected. But it seems that there are options for automated software correction available for Adobe products [1]. --El Grafo (talk) 14:12, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, if you wish. My intention was, to show the entire central dome as close as possible. Not sure is some distortion on the small domes (of them at least two always will appear along with the big one) is evitable, nor if I could do any more about it with LR/PS. Feel free to vote as you like, I'm not Livioandronico and will surely neither insult you for that nor vote anywhere in revenge )) --A.Savin 20:15, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:21, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2017 at 02:35:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 20:25, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 22:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Vestmannaeyjar harbour, Heimaey‎, Westman Islands, Suðurland, Iceland
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 20:24, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Sep 2017 at 22:39:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Moskva River, Moscow, Russia
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 20:22, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2017 at 08:28:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The pilgrimage church of Maria Limbach in front of Franconian vineyards.
  •  Comment You had accidentally written "file" two times when creating the nomination page, calling it File:File:Maria-Limbach-026421.jpg. I have moved the page for you and hopefully things are ok now. --cart-Talk 19:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:49, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2017 at 11:44:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Children in front of the Opera at Sechseläutenplatz in Zürich, Switzerland
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 16:50, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2017 at 21:10:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The fisherman's bicycle
  • Ezarate: Actually, the whole scene is the subject but that is hard to convey in a short title, as was the category. I don't think this is suitable for the FP category "Bicyles", perhaps "People" but the nearest I could come up with was "Places". Suggestions are welcome. I know that scenes are usually sneered at here since people just want plain clear photos of one identifiable subject. I think scenes that tell a story have a place here too. --cart-Talk 12:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I want to see anothers opinions but if all is the subject then nothing is in focus Ezarateesteban 12:18, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why??? Ezarateesteban 19:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 21:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 16:22:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rammstein aux Arènes de Nîmes
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 21:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 16:21:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rammstein aux Arènes de Nîmes
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 21:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2017 at 06:44:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The old bridge over Izhora River, Kolpino.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 13:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2017 at 15:28:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ruddy darter - Sympetrum sanguineum, female.
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2017 at 20:21:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tiên Sơn cave, Vietnam
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 03:51:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:56, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2017 at 08:40:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The slopes of the mountain Galičica with the Prespa Lake in the background
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:57, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2017 at 08:33:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Stiv (2,468 m) on the Baba Mountain, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2017 at 18:51:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Zubizuri Bridge ("the White Bridge"), view upwards. Bilbao, Biscay, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:58, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 07:09:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:42, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2017 at 19:02:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ferhat-Pasha mosque arabesque
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:18, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2017 at 15:57:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Comment The species needs to be identified (there are several species within the genus Haliaeetus) and the categorization needs to be fixed (Category:Birds is inappropriate). Where was the image taken? --Cayambe (talk) 20:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC) * ✓ Done fixed.[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2017 at 15:30:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Silver-spotted skipper (Hesperia comma)
I should read the description first ;-) Thank you! --Sputniktilt (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Such descriptions/info should be on the file's page where it can be seen long after this nom is over. I have copied it there but please think about that in the future. --cart-Talk 22:19, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 10:36:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Main portal of Mariazell Basilica, Styria, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 16:59, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 12:29:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-stripped Oil Beetle
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 17:00, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2017 at 17:12:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Central-eastern Brazil, by Copernicus Sentinel-2A satellite.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 17:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2017 at 23:38:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This is satellite image of Hurricane Harvey taken at 10:30:36 PM UTC.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 17:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2017 at 07:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

English rose "Wife of Bath"
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 17:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 10:50:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Small greenhouse with grapevines escaping
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 20:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Sweden

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2017 at 18:10:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Architectural detail of a wall
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 20:52:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Morning fog on the mountains around Mường Thanh valley, Vietnam
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 17:30:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Two-tailed pasha (Charaxes jasius jasius)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:03, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2017 at 04:19:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bassin Louise de Québec.jpg
It's better but I just can't bring myself to support it as a FP right now. Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Sixflashphoto: and @Ikan Kekek: Please take another look, I fixed the noise and the overdone shadow compensation. Thanks --The Photographer 17:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Because the light conditions and objects not static (not buildings for example) was imposible take this picture without ISO and preventing the motion blur in all the boats. I can't understand why we need apply the same rule for all the pictures on different conditions and equipment. Thanks anyway for the reviews --The Photographer 12:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose I can see what you were trying for. But all that dark backlit area in the center of the image sort of ruins the effect you saw. Daniel Case (talk) 14:40, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Daniel Case The first upload is better, however, the Noise situation come and it's simply a paradox to me. Noise because ISO not should be a problem in this case because I'm applying the techique and tool that I have. --The Photographer 00:23, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 10:57, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2017 at 23:33:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

USS Intrepid (CV-11)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 11:28, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2017 at 09:34:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2017 at 12:58:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Sella group and the Gardena Pass in the Dolomites - South Tyrol
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 13:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2017 at 16:18:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Griffon vulture in flight
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 23:04, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2017 at 15:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Appples in the village of Ljubojno
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2017 at 01:57:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Big Ben.

 I withdraw my nomination

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:51, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 15:17:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Paradiski, Plagne Villages.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 04:30:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Landscape in Hrafnseyrarheiði, district of Vestfirðir, Iceland.
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco2 06:56, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2017 at 02:14:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco2 06:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2017 at 06:41:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cirsium eriophorum blossoming (Kozara National Park, Republika Srpska)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poco2 06:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Sep 2017 at 22:55:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kukenan Tepuy in Venezuela
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 11:30, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2017 at 07:09:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

House “An der Mauer 51”, Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 11:31, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2017 at 07:14:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Interior and gotic high altar of the parish church St. Cyriak in Pfarrwerfen, federal state of Salzburg, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:19, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2017 at 17:34:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jägala waterfall
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Sep 2017 at 19:17:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Jupiter's moon Europa
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2017 at 05:03:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Princely Bishop's Palace and St Paul's Cathedral, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--XRay talk 15:21, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2017 at 15:46:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Boat on the mouth of river Una to river Sava, Donja Gradina, Republika Srpska
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2017 at 14:03:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Southern white admiral (Limenitis reducta) underside, Sithonia, Greece

 I withdraw my nomination On reflection, I think I agree! Charles (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:31, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2017 at 22:09:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hermione replica comes off the Charente river, and reach open sea for the first time.

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 15:22, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:30, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2017 at 10:04:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Aqueduct of the Historic site of Chemtou, very famous for its Marble quarry

 I withdraw my nomination IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:29, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2017 at 15:59:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Addax nasomaculatus in Jerusalem Biblical Zoo
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2017 at 02:34:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Torrey Pines Sunset.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2017 at 04:49:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

St Paul's Cathedral, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 06:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 15:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2017 at 11:47:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Former monastery of Augustinian Canons in Eberndorf, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 12:34:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Glacial lake near the Brandner Glacier in Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2017 at 12:01:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Agricultaral fence post in winterly landscape in Radsberg, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2017 at 09:27:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Parish church Saint George in Obermuehlbach #70, municipality Frauenstein, district Sankt Veit, Carinthia, Austria, EU
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2017 at 09:18:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Escalator at Cantón de la Soledad Street in the Old Town. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Basque Country, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:23, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Sep 2017 at 15:36:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ruddy darter - Sympetrum sanguineum, male
 Info Yes, it is a young (immatures) male. --Hockei (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:08, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 16:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

James Leg portrait
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:07, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 16:19:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rammstein aux Arènes de Nîmes
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:07, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 12:31:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • While I appreciate the feedback (and thank you for the compliments), I have images of the same subject in roughly 10-minute intervals all the way back to sunset. I chose this one because of the compositional importance of the interior lights. I wanted the atrium and its surrounds to be lit up, which requires minimal light. -- Thennicke (talk) 23:58, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 11:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pinus taeda (Loblolly Pine) bark
"... it isn't that interesting unless you are into bark." Colin ... such dry humor! I didn't know you had it in you. This is the first time I've ever LOLed at something you said. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • For whatever it's worth, I agree that bark photos can be interesting and good compositions, and I previously supported some nominations of bark photos that not enough other people considered featurable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:25, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Order_:_Pinales

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2017 at 20:53:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of Saints Clement and Panteleimon (Ohrid)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:31, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Macedonia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 16:09:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lake Onega bay at Kizhi Island
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:27, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2017 at 13:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:29, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 00:48:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A statue of a "person" riding a bike.
 I withdraw my nomination --Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:08, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2017 at 08:41:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bird view of the Tanks of Maalga in Carthago the water come to them from Zaghouan through Aqueducts it flows a total of 132 km, making it amongst the longest aqueducts in the Roman Empire.
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:10, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2017 at 17:26:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Karababa castle

 I withdraw my nomination

 Support --fedaro (talk) 12:08, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:11, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm sorry, this is not a "not featured" picture, this is a "withdrawn" candidate... I think this a different.--Jebulon (talk) 17:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2017 at 04:17:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A strawberry.

 I withdraw my nomination--Talk to Kong of Lasers 01:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Only where the splash has been made to match the strawberry. If this was for real, there should be small strawberries in every little water drop. Then there is also the water in front of the strawberry, It has in no way distorted the strawberry behind it. I have never seen and object through billowing water that was not distorted. Please compare with other splashing fruits such as File:Orange Strawberry.jpg or others at Category:Splashes. It is no doubt a cool photo, just not sure it belongs here. --cart-Talk 16:47, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose (I've changed the category from "Plants" to "Food and drink"). I don't know about the rest of you, but I've never found myself in a dark room with some water and felt the need to drop fruit into it. This is the sort of image that is popular on stock photo sites but I can't see much educational value for it, other than as an example of the fad for "fruit splash" photos. Sites like Pixabay are more aimed to offering free stock photos, than educational photos, though there is overlap and plenty educational images too. -- Colin (talk) 16:26, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I'm loving this. :)--Peulle (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment CG? --Laitche (talk) 17:07, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Regretful oppose per Colin and cart. Although if we do someday have an article along the lines "food in advertising photography", or (better yet, a wikibook on taking photos that might be used in ads ... Daniel Case ({{int:Talkpagelinktext}) 17:08, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - Now that this photo is of sufficient size, I oppose it as an undeclared mashup of two or more photos, particularly as shown by the link Laitche gives above. I'm totally fine with stitching together multiple photos, but photoshopping one photo into another is not OK unless it's openly declared and not just presented as a cool thing without further explanation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per technical issues. I'm not opposed to having stock images like this one on Commons. Not at all. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak  Support. To me this is no different from File:Glühwendel brennt durch.jpg. Weak for the low resolution. -- King of 06:32, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Based on the link provided by Laitche, and this DeviantArt link, I'd have to agree this image is a Photoshop composite of photos, or does not in fact even contain a real water splash or real strawberry. The artist's other works appear largely artificial, and it is possible that the source images from which their composite works are created are not theirs to begin with (though might be free images). @King of Hearts, Kong of Lasers, and Peulle: The rules are clear: "Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable". If the source images for this composite are not created by the artist, that raises further questions about it's legitimacy as a file on Commons. With File:Glühwendel brennt durch.jpg that KoH links to, the manipulation is described, though to be honest, I've never thought those exploding bulb photos had much EV either. An FP must be accurately described and IMO should also be clear about authorship of all its parts. -- Colin (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per discussions above. --cart-Talk 12:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination --Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:50, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:15, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Sep 2017 at 21:30:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Half Louis d'or
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 08:49, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Money & Seals

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2017 at 09:00:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old man with a beard
  •  Oppose Too heavily compressed, leading to JPG artefacts and posterisation. The image looks like it has been upscaled, as there isn't much pixel-level detail. As a portrait, the eyes aren't well lit and the beard is lost somewhat in the light background. There's no EXIF, but I don't think the lens choice was best, as it appears to have been taken from close range, rather than the more flattened portrait one would expect from a telephoto. -- Colin (talk) 18:30, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 01:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 03:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:58, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2017 at 06:30:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water slide tower at the lido on Johannes-Brahms-Promenade, Pörtschach am Wörther See, Carinthia, Austria
While the lighting/sky is different in this one, I don't think it is at the level of those. For example, the first one above has the slide in dark like this, but has a lovely soft background and good reflection in the water. Here the subject is quite small in the frame as a result of the wide-angle lens. There is a lot of clutter to the right and left. The water reflection isn't as good and the foreground water not adding anything. The water also appears to have either chroma noise or colour moire. -- Colin (talk) 07:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 22:56:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A yellow flower taken at Balboa Park.

 Oppose You need to identify the species of plants and animals that are the main subject of a FPC. PumpkinSky talk 00:16, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PumpkinSky: ✓ Done It is Helianthus niveus. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 00:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Insufficient quality --A.Savin 00:22, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
@A.Savin: How is this insufficient quality? --Talk to Kong of Lasers 04:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet COM:IG by far. --A.Savin 11:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 13:50:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Water hose nozzle
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2017 at 11:19:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mont Blanc. Taken in La Plagne on the Roche De Mio.
 Comment I judge your vote as a revenge because of my deletion request. --Hockei (talk) 11:32, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nö, das ist wegen dem Grauschleier. Und dazu braucht man nichtmal einen kalibrierten Monitor, das ist im Histogramm deutlich erkennbar. Die Bearbeitung von Yann ist schon deutlich klarer aber wie bereits geschrieben müßte das am RAW gemacht werden. Ich würde es so vorschlagen aber ohne Rohdaten wird das Murks. --Ralf Roleček 13:05, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Why doubt? --Hockei (talk) 14:37, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Looked too clear! Charles (talk) 10:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For the fact that the pinky version is taken back your current oppose reason due to the color seems not quite honest to me. --Hockei (talk) 10:49, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Hockei: But still oppose per others. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:48, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you should reload your browser after opening the file. That Colin said it has a poor composition I cannot read out of his text. For possible hidden bad phrases my English isn't good enough, has it? --Hockei (talk) 06:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Hockei: It was inferred by "arbitrary crop" (willkürliche Ernte. I hope that noun is the right one ...) Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for explanation. I translate this in willkürlicher Schnitt (Bildschnitt or Bildausschnitt). Willkürlich isn't the same like schlecht or armselig (poor). More like not well selected rather randomly. But it's not important. --Hockei (talk) 11:01, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info I uploaded a new version with a bit changed white balance and some more pixels (7.7 MP) but not full resolution (max at GH5 12 MP in 16:9). This deletion request opened my eyes about wikimedia and some users restless. Some users do so as if the cc by-sa is like public domain. Photographers are just sucked out and then on the top of it they get a kick. I don't want to pull him in here but I totally agree with Pocos reasons. I decided I won't upload full resolution pictures no more even if the GH3 pictures only have max 12 or 16 MP (4:3). But my GH3 era is over in April 2017 and then comes my GH5 era. I'm not sure if I'll upload pictures from this camera to the wikimedia yet. It doesn't matter whether Colin or other users like it or not. Fact is that the pictures of Moroder almost all are too soft. Independently of the number of pixels. But he isn't willing to change his way so I have the right to say that. This isn't cheeky how colin said but just honest and true.
I won't withdraw the nomination of my picture but want your decision.
In spite of all I have to say thanks to all users they helped me to develop my skills in producing pictures from the raw photo (at last to Yann).
@Yann: I beg you to delete the copies of this picture because they are not needed no more. I hope it's possible in that short way. --Hockei (talk) 07:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
While I agree that Moroder's pictures have a consistent problem with softness, the point remains that at 6MP your image and his image are comparable in sharpness. Yet you nominate yours downsampled to < 6MP and expect us to go wow -- which is the criteria for FP. If Moroder did the same, he'd get fewer complaints about softness also, but also more complaints about unimpressive detail/size. Neither then are "among our finest" technically. We are left then with whether the image is among our finest artistically, and here Jebulon sums things up -- this is nice but nothing special. As for the DR, well Jim does not represent the whole of Commons nor Wikimedia, and he could have handled that better, but he was technically correct. If you use CC BY-SA then you can't be overly precise about attribution placement. Several people spent considerable time helping you draft a better wording, which I think better represents Commons community than some clumsy admin. I don't see how downsizing to 6MP will make a bean of difference to whether your images are stolen on the internet, as many Web usages require much smaller than that, and 6MP is sufficient to print A4 professionally. This kind of downsizing because you don't want to be more generous, will not impress anyone at Commons FPC and is exactly the sort of downsizing that is discouraged. Especially so when we see you complaining about 36MP images being too soft. That's just not fair play. In my opinion, if you are a professional photographer then by all means keep them "All rights reserved" as it protects your assets from which you derive your income and pay the mortgage. But if this is a hobby then who are you helping by worrying about someone in China or USA stealing your photo? It only gives you an ulcer and you will be no richer if you keep them under copyright on some Flickr album instead. -- Colin (talk) 11:23, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Colin: While I agree that this is not very sharp, you can't compare a picture taken from 39 km away, and one taken only from a few kilometers. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, I'm not aware there is a need to take the picture from 39km away, so that doesn't really help the case. The latest upload has turned the sky purple, so I don't know what is going on. The "finest on Commons" doesn't include pictures deliberately downsized so that Commons is a loser. If we all played that game, we'd all be judging 2MP images. -- Colin (talk) 21:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Colin: I have withdrawn my vote, as the colors are wrong now. But why do you talk about a need? A picture is taken from a given place, that's all. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If I take a picture of Big Ben from a poor or distant vantage point, then people may complain it isn't sharp, or the verticals perspective distortion is too much. But if I get a great location, that can make all the difference. That this image is ok from that distance is great, but doesn't itself justify FP. Thinking about it, Yann, I think the reason this image isn't popping out of the screen with wow is exactly because it was taken from so far away. The perspective compression that results creates a flat image almost like someone painted this mountain on a piece of card. We expect our mountains to be 3D. -- Colin (talk) 07:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Oppose For me, nothing different nor better than the ton of pictures of mountains we already have...--Jebulon (talk) 08:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jebulon: Just an advice. Click on the reload button in your browser after you opened the file then you'll see the difference. If not you maybe have more colour blindness than me. --Hockei (talk) 11:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Hockei: . Advices are always good, thank you. Again, this is just (for me) another (very good, even not that sharp...) pictures of mountains, as we have already tons in our FP collection.--Jebulon (talk) 15:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 17:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2017 at 07:59:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Towers of the former Benedictine Abbey of St. Michael in Bamberg
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2017 at 16:33:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bombus lapidarius
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2017 at 18:16:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 10 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Sep 2017 at 15:30:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Diesel engine of locomotive used by Latvian Railways
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 02:44:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Floating market at the Bridge on the River Kwai, Thailand.
  • PumpkinSky (and also Colin), if I may: I see that this photo was taken in April, and if I remember correctly, that was before you learned about RAW. If this photo is just the original jpeg from the camera, the program in the camera has made an automatic NR when it converted the RAW file to the jpeg you extracted. Jpegs from the camera has built-in NR from the start, even if you don't touch the slider in LR afterwards. --cart-Talk 14:16, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's probably the reason. But even in a raw converter like Lightroom, there's always some NR going on. For example, the colour NR in Lightroom defaults to 25 (and is best kept there unless one has huge ISO values and little reason to go smaller), and the demosaicing process aims to minimise noise. You need to use one of the open source raw converters to see what a raw file looks like out-of-camera, and it is quite awful. -- Colin (talk) 16:13, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Weak oppose The pleasant colors and exotic buildings are definitely eye-catching here, however the quality is quite blurry when you zoom... Something wrong has been done when capturing/editing this. -- Pofka (talk) 16:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2017 at 14:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kiruna kyrka
  • That sounds like a fantastic undertaking! It's not every day that a whole town gets moved because of a mine and I'm glad to hear they are taking the documenting seriously. --cart-Talk 18:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • W.carter, I really don't know about any possibility to attach a DSLR on a drone and take photos with it in flight. If yes, this probably would be quite a heavy drone, which needs special regulations (permission, pilot's license etc.) to launch it. --A.Savin 19:15, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • A.Savin You are probably right about the permissions and such, I'm no expert. If you Google "drone for DSLR camera" (text and or photos) there are quite a lot of them so not outside the realm of possibility, knowing that users here come with all kinds of unknown skills. --cart-Talk 19:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 04:38:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Remains of the church of St Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, Spain.
In retrospect, you are correct. Daniel Case (talk) 12:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 13:17:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 18:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 03:10:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Black Rhino grazing
  • @Yann: I will withdraw oppose if you can get the 6MB version showing up when I click 5,472 × 3,648 pixels. Charles (talk)
(Edit conflict)@Yann: Fine, but that was the lesser of the two issues Charles based his oppose on (see !vote below). Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Vox populi suprema lex est. Yann (talk) 09:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 17:23:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sarawak State Assembly building (Dewan Undangan Negeri Sarawak) in Kuching, Malaysia
All by me -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I removed it. Thanks for the hint. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I carefully looked into that. Due to the curved metal roof, you cannot totally avoid reflections. This reflection fortunately isn't blown out but just very bright. However, it cannot be handled with local reduction of exposure or reduction of whites/highlights. It would entail an area substitution in PS to achieve a suitable result. Personally, I do not think, that it is worth to remove the bright part of the roof in favor for a photoshopped matte. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 21:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:37, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 17:18:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Marina Beach, Chennai
  • The cart is leaning due to the perspective distortion which also explains why the people are leaning in unnatural ways. I agree with Peulle that this is too much for an FP. I'm waiting to see if this is fixed before I vote. --cart-Talk 11:53, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2017 at 18:46:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Montmorency waterfall, Québec, Québec
Thanks Jebulon, I will try pay more atention. --The Photographer 23:25, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Too many stitching errors at the cables and the left side is unsharp for no reason. The motive is fascinating.--Ermell (talk) 19:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • ✓ Done Thanks guys for the possitive feedback (negative votes or not), especially @Colin: and Milseburg. I uploaded another version in absolute full size and fixing the very left unsharp trees, the horizon (taking the Colin points control recomendation) and wires stitching problems. Please, tell me if it's ok for you. Thanks --The Photographer 20:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've had a quick look and the unsharp area and stitching issue is improved and the poles are now vertical, but the horizon now looks to dip a bit in the middle. It isn't easy if the "horizon" varies with height and distance, but perhaps some in-between value would help. You may be able to drag the vertical centre point a little to compensate. -- Colin (talk) 21:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks @Colin: , please take another look and tell me what do you think. Btw I fixed severals dustspot overthere --The Photographer 23:18, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2017 at 06:43:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Illuminated castle Egloffstein in Franconian Switzterland
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:19, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2017 at 09:11:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old house in Łupków (Лупків), Poland
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 12:22, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2017 at 20:41:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Street light at Doña Casilda Park. Bilbao, Biscay, Spain
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 00:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2017 at 15:31:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

S/V Rembrandt van Rijn in Disco Bay, Greenland
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 00:42, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2017 at 18:19:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Las Lajas Sanctuary is a basilica church located in the southern Department of Nariño, municipality of Ipiales, Colombia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 00:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2017 at 21:36:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tugboat Boss discharging ballast water before departure
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 00:44, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2017 at 08:42:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.::

Monarch Butterfly on Silver Pearl Millet Plant
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 11:18, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 21:48:27
Shows how to use Vernier calipers

  •  Info The animation is showing an incorrect way to read calipers. The proper reading here should be 2.470 cm not 2.47 cm and a reading of calipers should also always state the error associated with the reading. In this case the proper measurement is 2.470 cm ± 0.005 cm. As it stands, this is a reading that did not use the full accuracy of the shown instrument. (Original nomination)
  •  Delist -- Jason Quinn (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question As this is a FP on enwiki and not on Commons, wouldn't a delist discussion need to happen there? — Rhododendrites talk22:24, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent question! You are correct. This discussion can be closed. Apologies. Brain fart. Jason Quinn (talk) 06:36, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. --cart-Talk 19:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 21:20:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Classic Japanese masterpiece
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:54, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 10:06:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gazebo in the Colonial Garden at Norfolk Botanical Garden
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 08:22:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brajčino Cross above the eponymous village, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 12:44:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Theotokos in the village of Dolenci, Demir Hisar, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 12:39:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Night view of medina of Tunis with the main subject here The Mosque Saheb Tabaa.
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 19:58, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 08:26:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dome of Ferhadija Mosque (Banja Luka, Republika Srpska)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 20:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2017 at 08:20:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of the village of Šlegovo, Macedonia
✓ Done Cropped. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Cropped. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:28, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 20:01, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

«»===File:Montes de Mezdi sëura Calfosch Dolomites.jpg, not featured=== Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2017 at 09:02:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mezdi peaks over Calfosch in the Dolomites

 I withdraw my nomination --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 20:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 08:53:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Castle ruin Geiersberg, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:30, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2017 at 11:43:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Spotted fritillary (Melitaea didyma) in the Republic of Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 13:00:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Heyang, an ancient village in Jinyun, Zhejiang, China.
@A.Savin: Surprisingly good? --Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:30, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:25, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#China

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2017 at 13:03:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Krestovsky Stadium in Saint Petersburg, Russia
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:27, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Russia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2017 at 10:49:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Adam Thoroughgood House - South
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 17:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#United_States

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 11:11:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Marius Romanus Mausoleum In historc site of Aggar in Kairouan lies in a crossroad ... Im am nominating it for FP because the time goes on and only it and the Milky way behind still witnessing the show :)
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2017 at 10:03:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sign of house “Prinzipalmarkt 22” and in the background St Lamberti Church, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • The background is a special counterpoint (young and old, near and far, fun and violence). You can see both only with this perspective. (BTW: That's why a focal length of 170 mm must be used.) --XRay talk 18:15, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Spurzem: Packground? --Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:46, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Kong of Lasers: Thank you! It seems impossible but obviously not. ;-) -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 06:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 12:34:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Snow accumulation in National Park Pelister, Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Ice

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2017 at 14:51:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kizhi Island, Karelia, Russia

 I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 22:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2017 at 07:39:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

বাংলা: দিঘাপতিয়া রাজবাড়ি (উত্তরা গণভবন) English: The Uttara Ganabhaban (meaning Northern People's House) is an 18th-century (1734) a royal palace also known as Jaminder country house and retreat, it was made by Raja Doyaram who was the Dewan (like minister) of Rani Bhavanee This is a photo of a monument in Bangladesh identified by the ID BD-E-44-36
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:43, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 23:05:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Conifer Garden at Norfolk Botanical Garden
Given all the opposes, it's rather pointless now. I only know a couple by sight I'd have to go to the Botanical Garden to ID the rest. The light green one slightly right of center is an oriental spruce. PumpkinSky talk 13:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I stand corrected on the requirement part, but stand by the rest of my statement. PumpkinSky talk 15:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
PumpkinSky your "the FP community does more harm than good" comment is incredibly rude to your fellow reviewers, who are simply doing their job. All because we failed to sing the praises of a couple of your rather ordinary photos. While FPC is sometimes a game of roulette, it isn't a game to play with pretty much most of your uploads in the hope a few pass the grade. The response is no surprise at all. FP is not QI and is meant to be difficult and selective. -- Colin (talk) 18:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ColinI see no point to continue this. You're incredibly presumptuous and condescending of others. PumpkinSky talk 19:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If I may: There's a very big distance between "crappy" and "not outstanding". But I suppose you'll find that incredibly presumptuous and condescending, too... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 22:53:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A performing killer whale at SeaWorld San Diego.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:40, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 17:39:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mountain Kozjak in the southern part of Macedonia
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 16:19:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church Saint Nicholas with monastery of the Dominicans, Friesach, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 07:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View over Gößweinstein with pilgrimage chapel and castle.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2017 at 02:55:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Old Donation Episcopal Church in Virginia Beach, Virginia. Founded in 1637 and rebuilt and remodeled several times since then.
I stand corrected on the requirement part, but stand by the rest of my statement. PumpkinSky talk 15:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:35, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2017 at 08:00:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church fresco - Triumphal entry into Jerusalem
  • Read more about the church. Well, momentally just in Serbian, Macedonian and Bulgarian language. Church is one of main, built 1872, second to Eparchial. So question is more, was it restored and when. Otherwise even smaller churches around got old frescos...welcome to Macedonia. --Mile (talk) 16:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • My feeling is: not restored, but completely new, in byzantine style. Something like at the pediment of Athens cathedral. The building is old enough, but not the fresco/mosaic. But I don't know.--Jebulon (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2017 at 07:42:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fresco of Virgin-of-Mercy on the northern wall of the subsidiary church Saint Anna in Saager, Grafenstein, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2017 at 22:09:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sandvik bay in Brofjorden
  • Neptuul, not quite sure what that was, could have been something from the photomerge or just sheets of rain since it was departing that way. It's gone now, thank you for noticing that. :) Some things show up in better contrast in the wiki software than in Photoshop or Lightroom. --cart-Talk 07:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for voting. Just to put the record straight, it is not a lake but a horseshoe-formed bay in a fjord, so not deformed. The beach really is curved. I don't think that matters for your voting though, but the info may be relevant to others. :) --cart-Talk 17:50, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Probably i'm wrong, sorry --LivioAndronico (talk) 18:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I guess u adjusted CCW (yes I meant CW tilted). Looks a bit better but still there in my view. And besides, the sky shows artefacts of wrong blending (not sure the exposure of the raw images were consistent). - Benh (talk) 16:42, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2017 at 13:00:05
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Currently featured version

New cropped and edited version

Result: 9 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. cart-Talk 08:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 18:51:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A boat rests unused, during winter, near the Acheloos river delta, a Natura 2000 site.
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 07:43, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 19:06:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church ruin Virigilienberg from the 13th/14th century, medieval city of Friesach, district Sankt Veit, Carinthia, Austria, EU
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 07:44, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 21:35:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Grosse Linde bei Teuchatz
✓ Done I could only find one, however. Daniel Case (talk) 16:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 07:46, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Tiliaceae

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2017 at 06:02:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Chemical Challenger
  • (Edit conflict) I think that for the sake of the photo and for those not used to extreme harbor lights, you could turn it down a bit. It will not harm the photo. Sometimes I have to do a bit of desaturating of original photos when photographing sea, sky and clouds here since no one would believe me otherwise. ;-) --cart-Talk 11:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 14:51, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 07:59:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 14:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Family : Asteraceae (Sunflowers)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Sep 2017 at 15:18:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hotel “Marriot”, Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:07, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 03:01:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colorful layers of sedimentary rock in Makhtesh Ramon in Israel
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:49, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2017 at 14:39:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gemeiner Schwefelporling - Laetiporus sulphureus
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2017 at 13:40:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Blue eye, by Amanda Dalbjörn

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 09:28, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2017 at 15:23:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lévis city, Québec
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 09:07, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 16:48:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • @Ikan Kekek: Not really sure about that rainbowy area. It might also be due to marble as there also are other shining areas (f.e. near right lamp). There is no other way to capture the whole chapel as it is one of the Vilnius Cathedral side rooms and it has quite small gates, so centered image is not possible here. -- Pofka (talk) 07:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 13:45:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view from the Hochgolling, the highest montaun in the Lower Tauern
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 02:34:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ship passes through a light patch amid dark fog on the San Francisco Bay
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
  •  Info all by me. — Rhododendrites talk02:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support I was on a ferry on the San Francisco Bay recently and saw this big ship passing through a little pocket of light amidst dark fog. I don't think it's a traditional FPC, but I love the drama of the lost ship (in the literary sense) passing cloud-covered islands, surrounded by dark fog with just a little bit of light and blue sky. — Rhododendrites talk02:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support - I'd support cropping another third of the water in the foreground, but I support for the drama. I can easily imagine this as a cinematic shot. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:23, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • After your post-QIC advice, I experimented with a few different crops. One of the things I like about this image is the circular[ish] patch of light that illuminates the water as well as what's above water. For me, it contributes to the drama/cinematic feel. As I see it, that circle extends to near the bottom of the frame in the current crop. I didn't like the way a more severe crop cut into that shape. If it were otherwise I would surely agree with you from a composition point of view. Not sure if I'm explaining that well, or if I'm helping or hurting by explaining, but there it is. :) — Rhododendrites talk22:23, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have to take issue with this. I don't mind if you oppose because it doesn't strike you as a FP or if it seems too melodramatic (I would agree re: the latter, except that's why I like it), but it sounds like you're accusing me of lying and/or misrepresenting re: vignetting. There was no vignetting added. Any tone adjustments were done to the entire image. The only exception was a minor adjustment to the ship itself (and not its surroundings). If it helps to clarify, you can see another example from shortly after here: File:Ship in the SF Bay fog (40413).jpg, in which the effect is still visible on the left but not so much the right. — Rhododendrites talk15:22, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 08:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 18:47:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:59, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 14:43:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Herbaceous plants of choram county.png
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 23:00, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 14:24:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Waterfalls in the Seebach Valley near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:57, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria#Carinthia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 16:01:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2017 at 08:14:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rynok Square, Lviv, Ukraine
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:42, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2017 at 09:21:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Magpie moth (Abraxas grossulariata)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2017 at 11:12:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Typical view of Mosque Zitouna Through the arches of its minaret showing its two domes and medina of Tunis and the mountain Boukornin in The background : those are the three great signs showing that you are in the capital of Tunisia.

 Support --fedaro (talk) 21:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2017 at 15:56:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Wiesbaden, Kurhaus
The "Kurhaus" is the main object, so I put the fountain close to the border to guide the viewers look from the first over the second fountain to the building. --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Which is also the reason why the nearest foreground is a bit unsharp. I think your point of view is valid, so I'll give you mild  Support, though I wish there were some space to the right of the fountain, and the lack of it creates tension in the composition, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 01:47, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Germany

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 04:42:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 11:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2017 at 16:25:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Arndorf Altar, Maria Saal
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 17:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Sep 2017 at 13:06:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Xiandu, Jinyun, Zhejiang, China.
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:56, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
Xiandu, Jinyun, Zhejiang, China.
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PumpkinSky talk 22:56, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2017 at 10:48:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Amethyst sunbird
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 17:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 08:36:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kurfürstliches Palais Trier, staircase
✓ Done --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 16:12, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2017 at 22:47:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Colonial Garden gazebo at Norfolk Botanical Garden
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 17:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2017 at 22:46:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pinus palustris bark
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Order_:_Pinales
  • Pinus palustris (Longleaf pine) bark. All by me. -- PumpkinSky talk 22:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- PumpkinSky talk 22:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry PumpkinSky, but I am not "wowed by something I saw everyday in Boston. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 04:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I  Support this one. The form is great, like a sculptor who creates a great bas relief with found objects. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Sorry but as I hinted last time, I'm bored already. And the rather harsh lighting isn't pleasing to my eye. It's a random piece of bark, no different to the bark 5cm further up the tree or 5cm further down, or to the left or right, or to the next tree, and so on. So for me just an example of texture in nature and close-up photography. So personally I'd be off trying to take a close-up photo of something different rather than another bark.
  • Also, the JPG is in "ProPhotoRGB" colourspace. Never use this for JPG. Nobody has a "ProPhotoRGB" monitor to see it on, and in fact nobody has ProPhotoRGB eyes as the colourspace includes many colours that are theoretically/mathematical rather than physically possible. The 8-bit colour of a JPG can't handle ProPhotoRGB with fidelity. It is intended as an intermediate working colour-space for doing colour manipulation in Photoshop on 16-bit TIFF files. You should use sRGB for internet JPGs. Also, unless you own a wide-gamut monitor, and have setup your software and operating system and monitor settings to take advantage of it, I'd strongly recommend using sRGB for the intermediate files too, as many software tools ignore or strip out colourspace details, running the risk that you end up with the wrong colours. -- Colin (talk) 08:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Support I agree with Ikan Kekek the relief textures and large close up depth of field are enchanting. HalfGig talk 11:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC) -- invalid double vote per Special:Permalink/285160421#Administrator_User:PumpkinSky_has_engaged_in_sockpuppetry -- Colin (talk) 14:26, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Support Taking Colin's point about the colorspace (where does it say this, though? All I see in the metadata is "uncalibrated"), I still like the texture and depth. Daniel Case (talk) 14:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Quality is really good but it lacks something special to me in order to consider it one of our finest, sorry Poco2 18:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose If you will nominate all your bark pictures it is very hard to pick out the best one. I'm afraid that's not very exciting.--Ermell (talk) 21:15, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Question @Ermell: For one thing, this is a different species. So by using the same logic as you we shouldn't be able to have multiple FPs of those moth and butterfly photos that are all shot and/or mounted the same way, we shouldn't have a FP of a Mercedes E-class if we have an FP of a Mercedes C-class (or whatever make of car), if we have an FP of one Medieval German church we can't have an FP of another one, etc etc usw usw. Because this is basically what you're saying. We even have FPs of the same species and these two bark photos are not the same species and a totally different motif. Your oppose rationale is nothing but a hypocritical double-standard and as far as I'm concerned it is not a valid rational. What's good for the goose should be good for the gander but here it clearly isn't. These double standard rationals at FPC need to stop here and now. So which German church FPs are you going to put up for delisting since by your logic we should only have one German church FP, one moth\butterfly FP shot and mounted the same, one bark photo regardless of the species, one flower photo regardless of species, etc? Maybe I'll start opposing all the German church and mountain FPs because I'm bored with them and don't feel like picking out the best one. PumpkinSky talk 21:28, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Comment@PumpkinSky: I'm sorry if the picture didn't immediately show that this is a different species. It is in the nature of things that it is more difficult to depict tree bark in an interesting way than churches, which do not necessarily have to be German. To be precise, I just don't find this picture interesting enough for FP. You should not react so irritated to justified criticism just try to improve your pictures here is where it worked.--Ermell (talk) 22:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        •  Comment@Ermell: Then that's what you should have said, not say we can we can only have one bark photo, period, of any kind. This was not justified criticism, it was a cop out on your part. This is clearly labled Pinus palustris not Pinus taeda, if you'd looked. Have you ever opposed because there's already a flower photo? I doubt it. I've seen this many times, different rules for different photos or whatever. We can have multiple photos of a bird species but only one of bark? What sense does that make? None. I'm done with the double standards, hypocrisy, and other things I have seen here. I'm done with Commons. PumpkinSky talk 22:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination PumpkinSky talk 22:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 17:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2017 at 22:39:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tropaeolum majus flower and button.
@Jebulon: How do you fix it? --Talk to Kong of Lasers 22:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose The surroundings are also not pleasing to the eye, especially the wall with something written on it. --Shishir 3:46, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
@Shishirdasika: I actually had never noticed that. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 15:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@HalfGig: Your reason? --Hockei (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 I withdraw my nomination Per everything above except HalfGig's unsupported vote. --Talk to Kong of Lasers 15:57, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 17:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 15:07:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Seven Saints who honored in several southeast European Orthodox Churches as the creators and distributors of the Cyrillic and Glagolitic alphabet
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 17:25, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 09:37:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Statue of Liberty, by Anthony DELANOIX

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 18:00, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 17:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 15:34:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Saint Naum Monastery (Sveti Naum) near Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia
@PumpkinSky: No need to support twice. . --Talk to Kong of Lasers 23:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OOPS. Struck out my second vote. PumpkinSky talk 23:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:32, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Macedonia

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 17:22:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Platalea leucorodia in Danube Reserve
not breaks but nesting :)--Anntinomy (talk) 18:55, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:31, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2017 at 09:35:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Bay of Agios Minas
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 16:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 09:49:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

CN Tower, Toronto, Canada
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 06:45:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 16:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 05:19:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Marsh Grass-of-Parnassus
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 06:27:14 (UTC)

  •  Info Set of images of the interior of the Notre-Dame Basilica, located in the historic district of Old Montreal, in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. The interior of basilica, built in Gothic Revival style, is impressive with vivid colors, stars and filled with hundreds of intricate wooden carvings and several religious statues. It was built between 1823 and 1829 after a design of James O'Donnell and it has become one of the landmarks of the city. All by me, Poco2 06:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info I've seen many churches in my life but this one is one of those that really impressed me after I visited it in 2007, but the pictures I took back then didn't make it justice. Poco2 06:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Poco2 06:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment First let me say I'm very happy to see you contributing new images again. I recall Diliff's version File:Notre-Dame Basilica Interior, Montreal, Canada - Diliff.jpg (which actually dates from 2006) and his comments at the FPC: "It's quite a dark interior and to preserve the highlight details, I've chosen not to bump the shadows too much. As is often the case, the full size image doesn't look as dark as it does in the thumbnail so please view at 100%". This last comment is true: if one makes his image full-screen, the eye adjusts to the lower ambient light compared to a thumbnail on white. My first thoughts on seeing this collection was "who turned the lights up max" and "why is everything so yellow". Aside from the HDR brightness and colours, I don't think the pulpit shot is at FP level. You've shot it too close and the extreme perspective distortion is too much. I'll have a closer study of the set later. -- Colin (talk) 06:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Colin: You're probably right about the pulpit, but there was not much playroom behind me. Either this way or with a partial view of the pulpit due to the benches (as there was no possibility to get to the upper level of the basilica). The pulpit is not essential part of the set, though, I could remove it. Poco2 07:27, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good point by Colin. This set looks as shiny as Las Vegas lights. Comparing to Diliff version, it is clear that naturally this place is not that shiny. EDIT :  Support the new version of the set. -- Pofka (talk) 07:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Yes, I have to say it never looked anything like this when I visited. I will freely admit that I visited in January late in the afternoon where there was no ambient light filtering through the windows, whereas there is in Poco's version, but I don't think it needed to be processed with so much luminosity. It seems much too bright and saturated, not just compared to my recollection of the scene, but also aesthetically speaking. I think all the images would benefit from a more low-key approach to processing but that is just my gut feeling. Diliff (talk) 08:19, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Well, from my point of view, your version, David looks too dark to me, to be honest. Yes, we had daylight coming into the church, as you can see here, but still I feel that the lighting in the church was stronger. These pictures do reflect pretty much what I recall, I can surely reduce the exposition a bit, but not to that level. Regarding saturation I've to say that the colors of this basilica are really vivid, specially the altar. It would be great to hear the opinion of somebody who has been recently there. Poco2 08:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • I'm not saying you should reduce it to the levels of my image. As I said, mine was taken without any ambient light as it was dark outside. The lighting was very different so I'm not saying it should look like mine. My image looks as it looked when I visited (very dark, just the lights of the altar and a few lights on the columns). Yours obviously had more ambient light during your visit, and I can see that more of the lights in the stalls were turned on, as well as more lights on the altar too. I'm just saying that regardless of how it was when you visited, it appears a little too bright in these images (objectively speaking). The colours are a bit washed out and some highlights blown or nearly blown (perhaps just one colour channel blown, which results in a flat area of no detail). Look at the altar and ceiling, there's a lot of detail missing there. Look at the rays of light coming from the middle of the spires in the centre - there's shades of yellow that are almost completely missing - it looks almost white. I just think this is the result of overexposure (or at least processing so that it is too bright). We don't perceive really luminous colours as 'blown' in the same way a camera and display with limited dynamic range portrays them. I can't imagine that this is how it really looked in person. Diliff (talk) 10:10, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
          • David, I checked the sources of light again. Apart from the fact that apparently all lamps were on, when I visited it, there are several light inlets in the church not just in the walls, but in the roof, some are over those lamps in the middle of the nave and a bigger one over the main altar. About your comments on overexposure will check that closely this evening. Poco2 12:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose HDRish colors, temperature, with last one flare problems. --Mile (talk) 08:52, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - I was there last summer (that is, summer of 2016), on an afternoon. There was some light coming in, but if I remember correctly, it wasn't nearly as bright as depicted in these photos, although it was brighter than when Diliff was there. I feel like the atmosphere in the church was closer to Diliff's version, though. I hope my girlfriend, a former resident of Montreal, has a chance to look at these photos, because she could say whether it ever looked this bright in her experience. I'll let you know what she has to say when I'm able to show these to her. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose Need perspectives fix, color temperature and wrong light processing. I know this building and how it look and the pictures are not showing the reality --The Photographer 10:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Por ejemplo, las columnas en la parte superior parecen estiradas hacia las esquinas. --The Photographer 15:25, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The Photographer: what you refer to are not perspective issues (as verticals are verticals), but rather "distortion issues", which IMHO are unavoidable in the corners. Poco2 17:05, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:51, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2017 at 23:03:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tiburon Railroad & Ferry Depot Museum in Shoreline Park in Tiburon, California, on San Francisco Bay, with city skyline in the distance.
I can support either crop but I think the new one is slightly better. PumpkinSky talk 02:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That would be better, yes. It's still a little bit underexposed (the whites should be close to 255 without exceeding it), and the technical issues mentioned by Julian should be fixed. -- King of 04:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support contingent on a few improvements. I do mostly like the composition (the sailboat is a small but excellent touch) but as KoH says, the grass near the bottom could be cropped out without cutting into the bottom of the closest bollard... content-aware fill may do a decent job of cloning it out without cropping. Also, I would run it through lens profile corrections to remove color fringing, vignetting, and minor distortion. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:14, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Juliancolton and King of Hearts: It's an Olympus MFT camera, so lens corrections are built into the raw file (discovered this when trying to figure out where the profile for it was in Lightroom). That said, I've gone in and done some manual defringing. Also did a bit of a perspective adjustment to address the distortion issue you mentioned. That necessitated a bit different crop. Brightened a little bit, and applied a minor vignetting correction. The result is here (again, I've reverted to the original for FPC purposes, but will change if there's a broad sense this new version is an improvement). Thanks for your feedback. — Rhododendrites talk06:13, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, I didn't know that! You learn something new every day. :) Yes, I think the linked revision is notably improved. Hopefully enough other participants chime in to endorse making that the live version. –Juliancolton | Talk 13:44, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 22:28:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Leshan Giant Buddha
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 19:53:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Church of the Holy Trinity of the Trinitarian Order in Kamianets-Podilskyi (Ukraine)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2017 at 05:28:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Comment "...difficult to watch..." IMO, depends on the size of monitor. If the size of the screen is sufficient, then all details of this world of insects are visible. --KSK (talk) 07:26, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Sep 2017 at 14:56:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Woodcarved polychrome figure representing Saint John Baptist from Val Gardena, 18th century.

Alternative version

[edit]

Woodcarved polychrome figure representing Saint John Baptist from Val Gardena, 18th century

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 09:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Curonian Spit National Park
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Russia
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2017 at 18:27:00 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--cart-Talk 12:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2017 at 11:25:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brown argus - Aricia agestis
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2017 at 08:10:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Veitenstein in the nature park Haßberge
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2017 at 03:45:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Panoramic view of Québec ville harbour
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 07:38, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Sep 2017 at 15:45:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Kazan Cathedral, Saint Petersburg
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:40, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 05:01:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Left forecastle of the passenger vessel catamaran "Khadzhibey"
 Oppose If cart herself doesn't think it's featurable ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
and why? Cart decides it? boh ... weird--LivioAndronico (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: Why do you always side with W.Carter? Pretty interesting... --Talk to Kong of Lasers 23:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes I don't ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2017 at 11:51:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Ge'nyen, a mountain in southwestern China
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2017 at 22:34:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Nature site Kamyana Mohyla in Zaporizhia Oblast, Ukraine.The site encompasses a group of isolated blocks of sandstone, up to twelve meters in height, scattered around an area of some 3,000 square meters. Site is pictured inder lightning in May.
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 12:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2017 at 18:30:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Red-eyed damselfly - Erythromma najas, male
I wouldn't have the same feeling when I view this photo. I like it very much as it is. --Hockei (talk) 17:33, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:59, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2017 at 23:48:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Plate at Nyhavn, Copenhagen, Denmark
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 07:58, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects
[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2017 at 02:41:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pocitos, Montevideo, neighborhood and beach
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 07:58, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2017 at 08:32:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sequence of Solar eclipse starting 9:06am, totality at 10:19am, and ending at 10:21am PDT on August 21, 2017. The photos taken in Corvallis, Oregon
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:23, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2017 at 15:47:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A stock waiting to be scrapped
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2017 at 23:57:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pula amphitheatre, Croatia.
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2017 at 22:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

You can if you buy a time machine, go back in time and do it. ;-D --Peulle (talk) 13:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Even that won't work since I don't own a DSLR. (I thought that everyone knew about my crappy cameras by now.) --cart-Talk 13:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks! Those were sort of some of my own thoughts when nominating this. Most good ship photos are taken looking at ships, not many of them are taken onboard ships, which is where I prefer to be. :) --cart-Talk 18:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2017 at 19:28:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cinclus cinclus in Western Ukraine
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2017 at 12:41:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Hongji Bridge in Nanxun, Zhejiang, China.
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 11:11:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Life around jungle
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 14:37:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Collegiate church Saint Martin and provost house in Gurnitz, Ebenthal, Carinthia, Austria

* Support - What part of liberal sites like this one are relevant to the wheels turning in D.C. Don't believe it: If you're a DC resident, call their many number. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 21 September 2017 (UTC) - I didn't post this bullshit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment @Ikan Kekek: did you accidentally paste in text from somewhere else? Daniel Case (talk) 15:44, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
+1? I asked at his talk page... --cart-Talk 17:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No. It looks like someone somehow impersonated me. I don't know how they did it, because they also made it look like I actually did it, if you see the history. I'm not sure what to do about this. I'm going to log out and change my password, but I hope no-one is keylogging me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 19:14:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rib vault in the choir of the parish church Freistadt, Upper Austria
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2017 at 21:58:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:21, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2017 at 16:51:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Rhododendron is a genus of 1,024 species of woody plants in the heath family (Ericaceae).

* Support it's good and neet Sahil ravuri 18:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." You have only made 9 edits. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. --cart-Talk 17:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* Support Koushik Avula (talk)

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2017 at 09:38:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

  • Jebulon, I think you are right that the polarization filter is what is causing the problem. From what I know, strong, harsh light is not usually a reason to use such a filter. It is more designed to get rid of reflections on surfaces. I think stong light is better to control by altering the APEX exposure bias (say -0,7 or so) and fix things later in post-processing. I recently did a test myself to see how a polarizing filter altered a scene and the result looks a bit like your photo. I shot the exact same scene with and without a filter on a very bright and sunny day. I think it's a matter of taste which version you prefer. --cart-Talk 17:01, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Benh, PetarM, Jebulon, and W.carter: If I may offer my very humble opinion on polarizing filters...and I readily admit I don't have the knowledge or experience you all have, but I like my circular polarizing filters. In my experience, they can cut sunlight, affect colors---making them brighter or darker depending on where the sun is and where you turn the filter to, and cut reflections. See [4] and [5]. Just my two cents. PumpkinSky talk 01:51, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Something like that. You also loose some 1/3-half of stop. Checked EXIF of Jebulon shot. Focal 54 mm, Manual exposure, 1/60 sec, f/10, ISO 50. I would say, if you got best PL, you might loose in this Manualising. Automatic isnt that stupid, sometimes is better to leave it. I would say isnt sharp due to large time, i doubt its was on tripod. Tint +6 (i never saw od daylight that much), Vibrance +34, Blacks +28, Clarity +41, Luminance Adjustment Blue: -17. I think its more spoiled in software, with losing sharpness with handmoving (in case you got best and expencive PL), otheriwse add PL in it. --Mile (talk) 08:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you so much dear friends for your very wise comments and help.--Jebulon (talk) 16:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:42, 30 September 2017 (UTC)*Sorry no, this is not a « not featured » picture, but a Withdrawn one.--Jebulon (talk) 21:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2017 at 07:46:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

CAPTAIN BADR
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2017 at 07:45:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:43, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2017 at 07:52:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
Confirmed results:
Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2017 at 08:36:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Łupków (Лупків) - train station in winter
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:42, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture