User talk:GZWDer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GZWDer!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It were names of the files (unrenamed): [1]. Lesless (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello GZWDer, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SUL finalization - Doing 7 replacements

[edit]

Hello.
I am sure this wasn’t an isolated mishap. It isn’t vandalism, but it is worse than vandalism because subverts attribution records. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:55, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So… you can’t now pretend that abandoned this Commons account. Very sad not to see any comment. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:Fort-orleans-return.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 19:04, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Categorizing DRs

[edit]

Hi. Because the DR process is heavily based on Transclusion, when categorizing DRs, please use <noinclude>[[Category:]]</noinclude>. This is to ensure that only the DR is categorized. Otherwise, the DR lists and the archive lists are also categorized. Thanks, Storkk (talk) 11:18, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:拉姆油画.jpg

[edit]

Hi there,

  The copyright release evidence has been sent to the email you provided. Please check. Hiroooooo (talk) 04:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
An OTRS member will check it. I am not one.--GZWDer (talk) 04:45, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive?

[edit]

Dear GZWDer, Are you active or inactive, as your user page suggests? Vysotsky (talk)

File:白馬峰普天宮鎮殿聖母.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:大庄媽祖.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2001:B011:A401:12F7:10D9:9677:EB9D:9B33.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Nathan Loomis (1794-1876).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nathan Loomis (1794-1876).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]