User:Ziko/Archive 2011-2013
File:WPL_Eishockey.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Teofilo (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Category discussion notification | Category:Melford has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
File:2011-01_wikipedia_ten_nl_01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
GeorgHH • talk 16:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:20, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
Hoi Ziko, nette Sache, sehr anschaulich :-) --:bdk: 23:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:2011-01 wikipedia ten nl 01.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2011-01 wikipedia ten nl 01.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:2011-01 wikipedia ten nl 01.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Leyo 12:26, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 14:13, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:2011-07 Franeker Martinikerk 02.jpg was uncategorized on 3 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:13, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:2011-06 Visbrug 1 32083 04.jpg was uncategorized on 25 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:2011-09-21 Köln WMDE Wirtschaftsplan.jpg was uncategorized on 28 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 09:51, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:2011-10-22 ballot paper wmf board.jpg was uncategorized on 23 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:57, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Fehlender Parameter "Land" bei WLM-Vorlage
[edit]Hallo Ziko, du hast die WLM-Vorlage bei deinen Bildern ohne Parameter für das Land eingesetzt, so dass deine Bilder in die Kategorie unknown country einsortiert werden. Richtig muss es lauten: {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2011|de}}--Cirdan (talk) 07:19, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Please give images better names
[edit]
→AzaToth 21:11, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Please give images better names
[edit]
→AzaToth 15:28, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Ziko,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Attend the award ceremony of the Dutch Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
[edit]Dear Ziko,
We've already thanked you for your contribution to the Wiki Loves monuments photo contest. But with a contest, there are prizes to win! The award ceremony will be held in Utrecht on Saturday the 5th of November, at the end of the Dutch Wikimedia Conference at Media Plaza, held the same day. Media Plaza is located next to the Central Station in Utrecht, in the middle of the shopping mall. Remember: in order to make a chance to win, you need a confirmed e-mail address added to your Commons settings.
|
Wikipedia Arabic Map
[edit]Hi Ziko, Regarding this map, I am wondering where you managed to obtain the statistics? Are they periodically published somewhere? Thanks Moemin05 (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Real Life Barnstar | |
WCN 2011 org Vera (talk) 20:52, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |
Has the depicted person given her consent to the publication of her picture? 80.245.147.81 11:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
File:Digitale_Enzyklopädien.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
sугсго 08:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:1958-UK-DB.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:1958-UK-DB.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1958-UK-DB.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kobac (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:1964-uk-kongreseto.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:1964-uk-kongreseto.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1964-uk-kongreseto.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kobac (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:1960-revesp-dec-canuto.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:1960-revesp-dec-canuto.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1960-revesp-dec-canuto.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kobac (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:1961-uk-bankedo.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:1961-uk-bankedo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1961-uk-bankedo.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kobac (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:1974-revesp-sept-frontpagxo.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:1974-revesp-sept-frontpagxo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1974-revesp-sept-frontpagxo.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kobac (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:1956-uk-inauxg-malmgren.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:1956-uk-inauxg-malmgren.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:1956-uk-inauxg-malmgren.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kobac (talk) 02:08, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
File tagging File:2005-dasgupta.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:2005-dasgupta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2005-dasgupta.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kobac (talk) 02:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments NL
[edit]Beste Ziko,
Alle winnende foto's van Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 zijn ondertussen gedrukt als kalenders.
Wikimedia Nederland stelt er hier 100 van beschikbaar voor alle uploaders van de afbeeldingen. Geef op de bijgevoegde link je naam en adres en we sturen je kosteloos een exemplaar toe, als dank voor je deelname! Let op: op = op!! Bestel hier één kalender per adres.
Ook dit jaar zal er in september weer een Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments plaatsvinden, als onderdeel van de internationale wedstrijd. Meer informatie vind je tegen die tijd op http://www.wikilovesmonuments.nl/.
Ook zoeken wij nog vrijwilligers die het leuk vinden om mee te helpen met het organiseren van de landelijke wedstrijd of van locale evenementen (een "Wiki takes..." in je eigen woonplaats dus!). Meer informatie daarover vind je op de wiki van Wikimedia Nederland.
File:2010-05 verk posters 01.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 15:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
File:2010-05 verk posters 03.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 15:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
File:2010-05 verk posters 02.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
File:2010 election posters doetinchem.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
File:2010 election posters doetinchem.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sreejith K (talk) 02:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Wikimania
[edit]Hello, thanks for your Wikimania photos! Didn't you have many more on that Google+ album? It's a pity not to have all photos here on Commons. Also, if you know more people who posted photos on Flickr/Facebook/Google+/elsewhere, except those correctly tagged on Flickr, it would be wonderful if you let me know. Thanks, Nemo 09:46, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello,
Thanks for posting photos during “Wiki loves monuments 2012”. Unfortunately, the picture you took of the Hôtel de ville in Boulogne-sur-Mer can't be accepted. In fact, this building is not protected as “Monument historique”.
Best regards, Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
File:2012-09 tk verkiezingen.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 15:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
File:2012-09 tk verkiezingen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
File:2004 varsseveld verkiezingen.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 17:10, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Rijksmonument 0
[edit]Ziko,
je recente uploads van foto's in Delft en 2005 Münster St.-Paulus-Dom zijn allen met vermelding van Template:Rijksmonument 0 (nul, onbekend Rijksmonument nummer). Een aantal foto's zijn hierdoor door een bot geplaats in Category:Rijksmonumenten in Amersfoort. Kun je beide corrigeren? Het is eenvoudig te controlen of ze allen gecorrigeerd zijn: ze dienen dan niet meer vorraan te staan in Category:Rijksmonumenten with known IDs. HenkvD (talk) 05:27, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Ziko, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 14:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
File:2011-01 wikipedia ten nl 01.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 12:26, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
File:2011-01 wikipedia ten nl 01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vera (talk) 22:56, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Holiday greetings
[edit]Wishing you the happiest of holidays — Vera (talk), December 2012
and the best new year!
|
Hey Ziko, een aantal afbeeldingen in deze categorie hebben een onduidelijke naam, zou jij ze middels {{Rename}} er iets beters van kunnen maken? --Vera (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
[edit]Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!Dear Ziko, Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by odderBot on 14:30, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Vectorizing and translating images
[edit]Please see :
- en:WP:GL (and it's German version, more active)
- use the {{Translate}} template when uploading
- Check if the translator is fixed
Yug (talk) 13:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Demande d'aide
[edit]Hello, Sorry to take your time. But I have a problem of mutual misunderstanding with two of our Dutch friends. I find it hard to make them understand that I'm a clumsy friend who wants help in their language. I was even more difficult to make them understand that I'm a crazy utopian and my only interest is the free dissemination of knowledge. Can you look at our exchanges and clearing up this misunderstanding? For Phoebus you can find all the information from Wikimedia France. I can also answer your questions. Thank you for what you can do.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overleg_gebruiker:Salix2#
--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
File:2007-06-08 Kölner Dom 02.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pedelecs (talk) 11:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A333 (talk) 11:57, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Interview for Wikimedia Blog
[edit]...
Hallo, ich habe Foto und Blog gesehen, meinen Glückwunsch - auch zum Reiseziel Brügge. Besten Gruß Ziko (Diskussion) 12:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für die Glückwünsche! Arcalino (Diskussion) 11:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
File:2013-08 HK MoH 16.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 21:12, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
File:Antwerpen-lange-wapper-slot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
BrightRaven (talk) 08:28, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
A photo you took
[edit]Hello, Ziko. I've been using a photo you took in my userpages, as I'm on it. I hope this is not a problem for you. --ralgis·/t/ 04:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
File:2013-10-06 WMDE Köln 06.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
1971markus (☠): ⇒ Laberkasten ... 23:59, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
File:2013-10-06 WMDE Köln 17.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
1971markus (☠): ⇒ Laberkasten ... 00:04, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
File:2013-10-06 WMDE Köln 12.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
1971markus (☠): ⇒ Laberkasten ... 22:53, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Irmgard Adam-Schwaetzer has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
PanchoS (talk) 11:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Ziko, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Hallo Ziko van Dijk,
Deine Grafik über die Wikipedia-Nutzung in verschiedenen Sprachversionen finde ich wirklich sehr interessant. Hättest Du nicht Lust das wieder zu aktualisieren (beispielsweise das Jahr 2012) ? Ich fände es interessant hier die Entwicklung zu sehen. Man würde ja vielleicht erwarten, dass die nationalsprachlichen WP-Versionen mit zunehmendem Ausbau immer mehr Gewicht im Vergleich zur global dominierenden englischen Version bekommen. Ich fände auch eine analoge Grafik ganz aufschlussreich, die zeigt aus welchen Ländern heraus die deutschsprachige Version wie häufig abgerufen wird.
Viele Grüße
--Furfur (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Ziko, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
- Hallo, ich glaube mich zu erinnern, dass die Daten damals nicht ganz korrekt waren... und überhaupt überlege ich gerade, wäre so etwas nicht vielleicht eine Aufgabe für Wikidata oder Wikimaps, mit einer Einbindung von jeweils neuen Daten? --Ziko (talk) 18:33, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
Aufzüge
[edit]Ich habe mich gewundert, dass es Aufzüge gibt, deren Herstellerbezeichnungen anderweitig konnotiert sind. Zum Beispiel enthält der Name eines Essener Aufzugsunternehmens den Familiennamen eines Spieleautors. Außerdem gibt es ein Kölner Aufzugsunternehmen, dessen Name den Familiennamen eines Formel-1-Weltmeisters enthält. --84.61.176.82 10:59, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Heute feiert Akihito seinen 80. Geburtstag. Von daher frage ich mich, welche Aufzugshersteller die Aufzüge in den Düsseldorfer Hotels „Asahi“ und „Nikko“ hergestellt/modernisiert haben. Es wäre nett, wenn der Benutzer PostTower auf YouTube diese Aufzüge filmen könnte. --84.61.176.82 11:07, 23 December 2013 (UTC)