Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Note

  • For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
  • Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Sahaib, battleground mentality, and edit warring

I believe we discussed a zillion of times that categories "Foo country in april 2023" "Foo country photographs taken on 2048-13-64" should not be further split in subcategories. User Sahaib apparently was unaware of this, and started mass-moving, which I found because they moved my file File:Perth Municipal Buildings seen from Tay Street.jpg, I reverted them and tried to explain, first in edit summaries, and then at their talk page, see User talk:Sahaib#May 2024, that no consensus that it is ok to split the categories, exists, and it is up to them to either find one of many discussions or ask a question at the Village Pump. They were not interested in listening and continued edit-warring. (Note that I uploaded about 30 files taken in Scotland on that day, and several hundreds taken in Scotland that week, but they have only been edit-warring moving one of them). Something needs to be done about this. Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: I have been a very active contributor to Wikicommons for almost 4 years with almost 200,000 edits and so would not like to be blocked. I disagree with Ymblanter and I feel I discussed it rationality on my talk page. I apologise if I reverted too much. Sahaib (talk) 19:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actially German photographs per day are often recategorized per Bundesland. I have not practiced it myself, but I will not protest, when I see categories "Saxony photographs taken on ..." Taivo (talk) 09:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See also Commons:Village pump#Category diffusion, again. I uploaded plenty of German photographs myself, and, indeed, I have seen them recategorized two times by two different users. I went to their talk pages, and one was receptive and another one was not, but indeed the argument both times was that they have seen existing categories per Bundesland and wanted to diffuse more categories in this way. Since there are people willing to diffuse categories and nobody wants to categorized the photos back to country categories, we naturally get more and more category diffusion even though there is no consensus to do this. Ymblanter (talk) 09:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's useless to sanction Sahaib while we continue to tolerate that people like J.-H. Janßen every single day create something like "Category:Neukloster photographs taken on 2023-06-28". Definitely we need a centralized discussion on this and/or a Request for comment. Only with a clear consensus we can delete all the mess and prohibit to create it in future. Regards --A.Savin 13:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this makes sense (though reverting my edits - in the file I uploaded - four times was clearly over the top). I will prepare such an RfC, just discussion on village pumps tend to attract only a handful of people, which then is a weak representation of consensus. Ymblanter (talk) 14:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: {{Taken on}} documentation says that location should contain the country. So I would affirm this in an rfc that the lowest category allowed is "<country> photographs taken on "single day". So splitting that further up by parts of country or smaller unit than day is not allowed. When (if) we get consensus for this, it should be easy with some bots to move the files up the tree. Multichill (talk) 19:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Protect → Semi-protect request for Unofficial flag of Nakhchivan (1991-1993).svg

I would like to request that the protection on File:Unofficial flag of Nakhchivan (1991-1993).svg be changed to semi-protection. Issues with the page were all related to Jurisdrew sockpuppets, which should (I think?) no longer warrant full protection status for the page. Thanks :) No Lives LeftNᴇᴡTᴀʟᴋ08:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Matrix Bedivere (talk) 15:27, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block request for User:DeadlyRampage26

DeadlyRampage26 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Re-uploading copyrighted Internet picture after a final warning. 0x0a (talk) 11:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the Jo Palmer MLC image is sourced at the link provided where the relevant department has provided licensing information. The Michael Kent image was taken by my wife as she is a photographer, and it was uploaded by me on behalf of her and her own work. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 11:25, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @0x0a as OP.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DeadlyRampage26 Please provide link where the Jo Palmer MLC image was published. The link you gave needs to include this image to indicate that it was made by the department. Regarding Michael Kent's image, thank you for contributing it and please ask her to send a permission to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" using work email . Here is the email template. Looking forward to your good news! 0x0a (talk) 13:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
One more thing. I've obtained the high res image. You can include the URL (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Michael_Kent_AM.jpg) of this file in the email to help VRT agents associate the email with it. 0x0a (talk) 14:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will do DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 09:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DeadlyRampage26 Any news? 0x0a (talk) 06:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block request for User:Donny679

Donny679 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log An account solely for the purpose of vandalism All the best -- Chuck Talk 16:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning to admins: NSFW content. All the best -- Chuck Talk 16:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File deleted, user warned Bedivere (talk) 16:16, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection needed on File:Kia Spectra -- 07-09-2009.jpg

Vandalism magnet, I see 99% vandalism in the history until end of 2023 or further. Please semi-protect. Thanks! File:Kia Spectra -- 07-09-2009.jpg - Inertia6084 (talk) (talk) 17:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 19:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block request for User:Paradoxa10

Paradoxa10 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

Only uploading copyvios from facebook.

All the best -- Chuck Talk 18:50, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. No activity after you warned him/her. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block request for User:Iamakisah

Iamakisah (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Continued copyvios uploading. 0x0a (talk) 15:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for a week, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 15:55, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vinuka2002

  • User: Vinuka2002 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: The user came back after four years to badly request deletion of all eight of their WLE uploads, with no reason other than "uploader request", in ignorance of the irrevocability of their cc-by-sa-4.0 licenses. They appear to be implementing some sort of "scorched earth" policy.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asking for a courtesy deletion doesn't go against the license tho so i would hardly call them ignorant Trade (talk) 22:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed.  Not done no reason to block. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 22:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block request for User:Alignseobody123

Alignseobody123 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Username for spam or containing advertising purposes Waqar💬 14:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Only one edit, no activity after warning. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block request for User:Cumbuco Silva

User: Cumbuco Silva (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

Reason for reporting: User insists on uploading images incorrectly, ignores all warnings, user has already been blocked previously. Eric Duff (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for a month, file deleted. Yann (talk) 10:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hasanalani97

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Really uploaded one out-of-scope file after warning, but as the user has no activity for more than 2 years, blocking is not practical. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block request for User:M4Z4T0 1MP4CT

M4Z4T0 1MP4CT (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Vandalism despite multiple warnings All the best -- Chuck Talk 18:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked for a week. Everything was already deleted. Yann (talk) 19:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block request for User:Wye River Upper School

Wye River Upper School (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Username for spam or containing advertising purposes All the best -- Chuck Talk 16:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Only one file, which is in use, so OK IMO. Yann (talk) 17:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block request for User:AshvilleFCMedia

AshvilleFCMedia (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Username for spam or containing advertising purposes All the best -- Chuck Talk 01:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I will message the account that they need to verify, but I don't see any issues with their upload, and the football club does have a Wikipedia article. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]