Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Old book bindings.jpg

Support --Vox Rationis 01:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this - different from many other and rather evocative --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support--WarX 13:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting picture in aesthetical terms. However, could be more informative if taken from a different angle. For example, none of the titles is clearly visible. Alvesgaspar 17:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, most of these books didn't have titles on their spines (I think only the one that's visible in the pic), so there's not really anything to see there. Brighterorange 13:05, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very nice. The information content in this picture doesn't depend on the books' titles. --MichaelMaggs 22:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support see Herby and MichaelMaggs --Packa 23:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice shot. Cat-five 05:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unadequat DOF, only the upper top of the middle books is in focus. And there is noise, probable caused by high iso. And for such old books I would like to see a more dim light --Simonizer 09:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ditto to Alvesgaspar. A good pic, but could easily have been a lot better - MPF 17:37, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice. Jkelly 18:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SupportRomary 20:22, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack Simonizer --Digon3 00:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lestat 09:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor quality Lycaon 17:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would say that something with titles would be preferrable but I think this picture will suffice- it is especially touching with the water-soaked book in the middle—the preceding unsigned comment is by ValerieTheBlonde (talk • contribs)
Support --Tone 20:23, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, like MichaelMaggs (1st version is better than the 2nd one) --Packa 19:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Um although the quality is not perfect (pretty noisy), I like it. --Atoma 18:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 13 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 10:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral There's a lot to like here, but the eye gets drawn in the wrong direction somehow. I've uploaded what I hope is a nicer crop of the same image. Would also love to see Brighterorange take another attempt at this photo. Ben Aveling 10:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for #2, the cropped version...The cropping has no purpose what so ever as I see, it, and doesno have the depth of the first pic--Vox Rationis 14:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Javier ME 22:50, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral => not featured. (Rule of the 7th day) Simonizer 10:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu