Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Garfield, Palisade, Colorado.jpg

File:Mount Garfield, Palisade, Colorado.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2023 at 18:58:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Garfield, Palisade, Colorado.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mount Garfield, Palisade, Colorado.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Colorado
•  Info created by WClarke - uploaded by WClarke - nominated by WClarke -- wclarke 18:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support Took this picture a few years ago near Palisade, CO. It was shot on a Hasselblad 500C with Portra 400. -- wclarke 18:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I would have leant over the railings. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's super noisy! - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 20:31, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not even a QI. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Extreme noise. Is that a deliberate photographic technique, though? It's kind of interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:21, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

  • Ikan Kekek: The noise is from the film grain. I think it gives the image more texture and emulates the look of an old western film, which felt fitting for a western landscape. The photo doesn't contain much digital noise, but rather film grain, which can be attractive. It is a mistake to put such an emphasis on every photo needing to be 100% polished and free of noise, which is so common at FPC. It deprives them of character and they feel sterile. I think too many photos here use the same digital techniques and there is little variation in photographic styles. - wclarke 14:49, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Oppose Lake of FP quality. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 08:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't mind the grain, this is argentic photography. But the railing is distracting. Yann (talk) 18:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I could let the sky pass as a variation of pointilism, but the blurred gate in the foreground combined with the flutter tape at the pasture fence are not matching my FP expectation, sorry --Virtual-Pano (talk) 21:16, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
• Kudos for trying a film shot! I think I see why you took that one. There is a FP hiding somewhere in that scene, and the fence has got a role to play in it. But something's not quite right yet, and I'm not even sure what it is ... --El Grafo (talk) 12:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 September 2023 (UTC) - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 06:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)