Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lümati künnapuu 2.jpg

File:Lümati künnapuu 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2014 at 17:43:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lümati künnapuu 2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lümati künnapuu 2.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Amadvr - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 17:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support, but could use a slightly longer description on the image page... Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 18:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Kruusamägi (talk) 18:37, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Wow enough for me. --Graphium 19:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 12:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow for me. Looking at the image, it is not immediately clear that the tree is its main topic. --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
• Weak  Support--XRay ^talk 16:35, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I've developed a soft spot for these Estonia pictures ... Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 04:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Geocoding would be appreciated. --P e z i (talk) 14:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's not bad at all, but the brightness gradient shouldn't be that obvious in my opinion. And nothing really stands out to me making this FP worthy. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 18:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:46, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnik^contribs 21:29, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not sharp and lighting rather dull. Composition isn't wow. -- Colin (talk) 11:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support great elm. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:07, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Perhaps because I live in Canada where this sight is so common it pains me to see it nominated as a FP. In does not invoke the lone tree motif nor the lonely road. Saffron Blaze (talk) 02:10, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Uninteresting composition. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 13:42, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good lighting and composition. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 20:51, 28 June 2014 (UTC)